CHA vs MHN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHA (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHN (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CHA | MHN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.83% | −1.49% | −1.41% |
| 1 week | −1.91% | −1.66% | −0.69% |
| 1 month | −5.14% | −4.27% | −3.96% |
| 3 months | −2.98% | −1.08% | −1.43% |
| 6 months | −2.78% | 2.82% | 1.85% |
| YTD | 11.19% | 21.03% | 17.97% |
| 1 year | 18.06% | 27.85% | 23.69% |
| 3 years | 198.35% | 160.46% | 149.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CHA vs MHN Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CHA (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHN (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CHA leads in 2 and MHN leads in 9. CHA is a Variable Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHN is a Variable Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MHN leads (−1.49% vs −1.83%). 1 week: MHN leads (−1.66% vs −1.91%). 1 month: MHN leads (−4.27% vs −5.14%). 3 months: MHN leads (−1.08% vs −2.98%). 6 months: MHN leads (2.82% vs −2.78%). YTD: MHN leads (21.03% vs 11.19%). 1 year: MHN leads (27.85% vs 18.06%). 3 years: CHA leads (198.35% vs 160.46%). Size (TRY): CHA leads (34.8M vs 32.8M). Investors: MHN leads (414 vs 189). Risk: MHN leads (4 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CHA or MHN?
Year to date CHA returned 11.19% and MHN returned 21.03%; over the last year CHA returned 18.06% and MHN returned 27.85%. Over the last month CHA returned −5.14% and MHN returned −4.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CHA or MHN?
As of November 2, 2026, CHA has a size of TRY 34.8M with 189 investors, while MHN has a size of TRY 32.8M with 414 investors. CHA leads in size and MHN leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CHA and MHN mean?
The CMB risk score of CHA is 5 out of 7 and that of MHN is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.