BVM vs ICV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVM (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and ICV (TEB Portföy Ondokuzuncu Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BVM | ICV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | 2.81% | — | 2.41% |
| Daily | −3.16% | 0.14% | 0.16% |
| 1 week | −4.63% | 0.54% | 0.46% |
| 1 month | −14.57% | 2.52% | 1.10% |
| 3 months | −23.62% | 8.93% | 3.53% |
| 6 months | −17.07% | 14.62% | 8.53% |
| YTD | −15.59% | 25.77% | 16.18% |
| 1 year | −66.39% | 30.81% | 19.94% |
| 3 years | −60.47% | 207.81% | 103.56% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BVM vs ICV Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BVM (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and ICV (TEB Portföy Ondokuzuncu Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BVM leads in 1 and ICV leads in 10. BVM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; ICV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ICV leads (0.14% vs −3.16%). 1 week: ICV leads (0.54% vs −4.63%). 1 month: ICV leads (2.52% vs −14.57%). 3 months: ICV leads (8.93% vs −23.62%). 6 months: ICV leads (14.62% vs −17.07%). YTD: ICV leads (25.77% vs −15.59%). 1 year: ICV leads (30.81% vs −66.39%). 3 years: ICV leads (207.81% vs −60.47%). Size (TRY): ICV leads (5.7M vs 3.9M). Investors: BVM leads (100 vs 40). Risk: ICV leads (2 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BVM or ICV?
Year to date BVM returned −15.59% and ICV returned 25.77%; over the last year BVM returned −66.39% and ICV returned 30.81%. Over the last month BVM returned −14.57% and ICV returned 2.52%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BVM or ICV?
As of November 2, 2026, BVM has a size of TRY 3.9M with 100 investors, while ICV has a size of TRY 5.7M with 40 investors. ICV leads in size and BVM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BVM and ICV mean?
The CMB risk score of BVM is 7 out of 7 and that of ICV is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.