Yatırımcı.AI

APJ vs BRF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of APJ (Ak Portföy BIST Şirketleri Fon Sepeti Fonu) and BRF (Deniz Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

APJBRF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

APJ vs BRF Fund Comparison
MetricAPJBRFCategory median
Daily−2.60%−1.59%−1.33%
1 week−2.18%−1.18%−0.68%
1 month−8.53%−6.05%−2.96%
3 months−8.23%−1.45%0.00%
6 months−13.41%2.51%2.05%
YTD2.94%22.49%17.79%
1 year5.57%25.82%24.45%
3 years78.08%—158.82%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the APJ vs BRF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of APJ (Ak Portföy BIST Şirketleri Fon Sepeti Fonu) and BRF (Deniz Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, APJ leads in 2 and BRF leads in 8. APJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; BRF is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BRF leads (−1.59% vs −2.60%). 1 week: BRF leads (−1.18% vs −2.18%). 1 month: BRF leads (−6.05% vs −8.53%). 3 months: BRF leads (−1.45% vs −8.23%). 6 months: BRF leads (2.51% vs −13.41%). YTD: BRF leads (22.49% vs 2.94%). 1 year: BRF leads (25.82% vs 5.57%). Size (TRY): APJ leads (67.6M vs 65.9M). Investors: APJ leads (2,705 vs 930). Risk: BRF leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date APJ returned 2.94% and BRF returned 22.49%; over the last year APJ returned 5.57% and BRF returned 25.82%. Over the last month APJ returned −8.53% and BRF returned −6.05%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, APJ has a size of TRY 67.6M with 2,705 investors, while BRF has a size of TRY 65.9M with 930 investors. APJ leads in size and APJ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of APJ is 6 out of 7 and that of BRF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.