ANG vs CHS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ANG (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and CHS (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ANG | CHS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.43% | −0.87% | −0.59% |
| 1 week | −0.35% | −0.62% | −0.46% |
| 1 month | −0.31% | −1.11% | −1.11% |
| 3 months | 5.29% | 4.77% | 4.12% |
| 6 months | 12.76% | 8.95% | 7.12% |
| YTD | 19.98% | 21.12% | 18.73% |
| 1 year | 26.76% | 29.74% | 26.93% |
| 3 years | 125.61% | 167.27% | 144.09% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ANG vs CHS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ANG (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and CHS (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ANG leads in 6 and CHS leads in 4. ANG is a Standard Fund fund managed by Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; CHS is a Standard Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ANG leads (−0.43% vs −0.87%). 1 week: ANG leads (−0.35% vs −0.62%). 1 month: ANG leads (−0.31% vs −1.11%). 3 months: ANG leads (5.29% vs 4.77%). 6 months: ANG leads (12.76% vs 8.95%). YTD: CHS leads (21.12% vs 19.98%). 1 year: CHS leads (29.74% vs 26.76%). 3 years: CHS leads (167.27% vs 125.61%). Size (TRY): CHS leads (169.8M vs 136.5M). Investors: ANG leads (33,196 vs 3,085).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ANG or CHS?
Year to date ANG returned 19.98% and CHS returned 21.12%; over the last year ANG returned 26.76% and CHS returned 29.74%. Over the last month ANG returned −0.31% and CHS returned −1.11%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ANG or CHS?
As of November 2, 2026, ANG has a size of TRY 136.5M with 33,196 investors, while CHS has a size of TRY 169.8M with 3,085 investors. CHS leads in size and ANG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ANG and CHS mean?
The CMB risk score of ANG is 4 out of 7 and that of CHS is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.