Yatırımcı.AI

AGB vs GPU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AGB (Bereket Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Büyüme Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) side by side.

AGBGPU
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AGB vs GPU Fund Comparison
MetricAGBGPUCategory median
Daily−0.79%−0.42%−1.41%
1 week−0.32%−0.06%−0.69%
1 month−2.83%−2.56%−3.96%
3 months−0.58%1.21%−1.43%
6 months0.94%5.29%1.85%
YTD14.55%20.98%17.97%
1 year18.87%27.67%23.69%
3 years100.14%198.87%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AGB vs GPU Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AGB (Bereket Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Büyüme Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AGB leads in 2 and GPU leads in 9. AGB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Bereket Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; GPU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GPU leads (−0.42% vs −0.79%). 1 week: GPU leads (−0.06% vs −0.32%). 1 month: GPU leads (−2.56% vs −2.83%). 3 months: GPU leads (1.21% vs −0.58%). 6 months: GPU leads (5.29% vs 0.94%). YTD: GPU leads (20.98% vs 14.55%). 1 year: GPU leads (27.67% vs 18.87%). 3 years: GPU leads (198.87% vs 100.14%). Size (TRY): AGB leads (333.9M vs 325.3M). Investors: AGB leads (16,097 vs 2,260). Risk: GPU leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AGB returned 14.55% and GPU returned 20.98%; over the last year AGB returned 18.87% and GPU returned 27.67%. Over the last month AGB returned −2.83% and GPU returned −2.56%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, AGB has a size of TRY 333.9M with 16,097 investors, while GPU has a size of TRY 325.3M with 2,260 investors. AGB leads in size and AGB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AGB is 6 out of 7 and that of GPU is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.