AFH vs GCS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AFH (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GCS (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AFH | GCS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.39% | −0.61% | −0.61% |
| 1 week | −0.20% | −0.35% | −0.42% |
| 1 month | −0.21% | −0.78% | −0.85% |
| 3 months | 4.08% | 4.05% | 4.07% |
| 6 months | 8.49% | 8.81% | 8.79% |
| YTD | 17.14% | 18.81% | 18.66% |
| 1 year | 28.18% | 29.50% | 28.02% |
| 3 years | 148.87% | 144.63% | 141.97% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AFH vs GCS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AFH (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GCS (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AFH leads in 6 and GCS leads in 4. AFH is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; GCS is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: AFH leads (−0.39% vs −0.61%). 1 week: AFH leads (−0.20% vs −0.35%). 1 month: AFH leads (−0.21% vs −0.78%). 3 months: AFH leads (4.08% vs 4.05%). 6 months: GCS leads (8.81% vs 8.49%). YTD: GCS leads (18.81% vs 17.14%). 1 year: GCS leads (29.50% vs 28.18%). 3 years: AFH leads (148.87% vs 144.63%). Size (TRY): AFH leads (8.3B vs 8.1B). Investors: GCS leads (977,330 vs 803,854).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AFH or GCS?
Year to date AFH returned 17.14% and GCS returned 18.81%; over the last year AFH returned 28.18% and GCS returned 29.50%. Over the last month AFH returned −0.21% and GCS returned −0.78%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AFH or GCS?
As of November 2, 2026, AFH has a size of TRY 8.3B with 803,854 investors, while GCS has a size of TRY 8.1B with 977,330 investors. AFH leads in size and GCS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AFH and GCS mean?
The CMB risk score of AFH is 4 out of 7 and that of GCS is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.