Yatırımcı.AI

ZP8 vs ZPR Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ZP8 (Ziraat Portföy Kehribar Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZPR (Ziraat Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) side by side.

ZP8ZPR
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ZP8 vs ZPR Fund Comparison
MetricZP8ZPRCategory median
Daily0.29%0.29%0.16%
1 week0.68%0.69%0.46%
1 month3.06%3.12%1.10%
3 months9.61%9.78%3.53%
6 months21.30%21.73%8.53%
YTD36.98%37.65%16.18%
1 year45.39%46.41%19.94%
3 years246.99%—103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ZP8 vs ZPR Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ZP8 (Ziraat Portföy Kehribar Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZPR (Ziraat Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, ZP8 leads in 2 and ZPR leads in 7. ZP8 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZPR is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZPR leads (0.29% vs 0.29%). 1 week: ZPR leads (0.69% vs 0.68%). 1 month: ZPR leads (3.12% vs 3.06%). 3 months: ZPR leads (9.78% vs 9.61%). 6 months: ZPR leads (21.73% vs 21.30%). YTD: ZPR leads (37.65% vs 36.98%). 1 year: ZPR leads (46.41% vs 45.39%). Size (TRY): ZP8 leads (41.6B vs 38B). Investors: ZP8 leads (4,473 vs 1,715).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ZP8 returned 36.98% and ZPR returned 37.65%; over the last year ZP8 returned 45.39% and ZPR returned 46.41%. Over the last month ZP8 returned 3.06% and ZPR returned 3.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, ZP8 has a size of TRY 41.6B with 4,473 investors, while ZPR has a size of TRY 38B with 1,715 investors. ZP8 leads in size and ZP8 leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ZP8 is 2 out of 7 and that of ZPR is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.