Yatırımcı.AI

PRD vs SPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PRD (Piramit Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and SPP (Sparta Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

PRDSPP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

PRD vs SPP Fund Comparison
MetricPRDSPPCategory median
Daily0.31%0.30%0.29%
1 week0.72%0.72%0.68%
1 month3.30%3.22%3.04%
3 months10.24%9.87%9.49%
6 months22.66%22.52%21.05%
YTD38.37%38.87%36.77%
1 year47.74%47.74%45.27%
3 years33.14%—255.19%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the PRD vs SPP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PRD (Piramit Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and SPP (Sparta Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, PRD leads in 6 and SPP leads in 4. PRD is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Piramit Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Sparta Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PRD leads (0.31% vs 0.30%). 1 week: PRD leads (0.72% vs 0.72%). 1 month: PRD leads (3.30% vs 3.22%). 3 months: PRD leads (10.24% vs 9.87%). 6 months: PRD leads (22.66% vs 22.52%). YTD: SPP leads (38.87% vs 38.37%). 1 year: SPP leads (47.74% vs 47.74%). Size (TRY): PRD leads (388M vs 293.3M). Investors: SPP leads (889 vs 751). Risk: SPP leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date PRD returned 38.37% and SPP returned 38.87%; over the last year PRD returned 47.74% and SPP returned 47.74%. Over the last month PRD returned 3.30% and SPP returned 3.22%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, PRD has a size of TRY 388M with 751 investors, while SPP has a size of TRY 293.3M with 889 investors. PRD leads in size and SPP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PRD is 2 out of 7 and that of SPP is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.