OTM vs TPV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of OTM (Azimut Portföy Otomotiv Sektörü Değişken Fon) and TPV (Aura Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | OTM | TPV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.49% | −0.22% | −1.41% |
| 1 week | 0.52% | −0.28% | −0.69% |
| 1 month | −1.71% | −0.34% | −3.96% |
| 3 months | −0.24% | −0.90% | −1.43% |
| 6 months | −3.87% | 2.48% | 1.85% |
| YTD | −1.17% | 0.80% | 17.97% |
| 1 year | −0.68% | 1.56% | 23.69% |
| 3 years | — | 91.80% | 149.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the OTM vs TPV Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of OTM (Azimut Portföy Otomotiv Sektörü Değişken Fon) and TPV (Aura Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, OTM leads in 4 and TPV leads in 6. OTM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TPV is a Variable Fund fund managed by Aura Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: TPV leads (−0.22% vs −1.49%). 1 week: OTM leads (0.52% vs −0.28%). 1 month: TPV leads (−0.34% vs −1.71%). 3 months: OTM leads (−0.24% vs −0.90%). 6 months: TPV leads (2.48% vs −3.87%). YTD: TPV leads (0.80% vs −1.17%). 1 year: TPV leads (1.56% vs −0.68%). Size (TRY): OTM leads (13.8M vs 7.9M). Investors: OTM leads (65 vs 27). Risk: TPV leads (4 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, OTM or TPV?
Year to date OTM returned −1.17% and TPV returned 0.80%; over the last year OTM returned −0.68% and TPV returned 1.56%. Over the last month OTM returned −1.71% and TPV returned −0.34%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, OTM or TPV?
As of November 2, 2026, OTM has a size of TRY 13.8M with 65 investors, while TPV has a size of TRY 7.9M with 27 investors. OTM leads in size and OTM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of OTM and TPV mean?
The CMB risk score of OTM is 6 out of 7 and that of TPV is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.