Yatırımcı.AI

OPF vs SGT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of OPF (Osmanlı Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) and SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

OPFSGT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

OPF vs SGT Fund Comparison
MetricOPFSGTCategory median
Daily−3.46%−5.30%−1.41%
1 week−1.78%−0.60%−0.69%
1 month−6.62%−2.54%−3.96%
3 months3.68%11.68%−1.43%
6 months12.55%38.73%1.85%
YTD35.86%50.90%17.97%
1 year39.31%48.24%23.69%
3 years234.29%—149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the OPF vs SGT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of OPF (Osmanlı Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) and SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, OPF leads in 1 and SGT leads in 8. OPF is a Variable Fund fund managed by Osmanlı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SGT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: OPF leads (−3.46% vs −5.30%). 1 week: SGT leads (−0.60% vs −1.78%). 1 month: SGT leads (−2.54% vs −6.62%). 3 months: SGT leads (11.68% vs 3.68%). 6 months: SGT leads (38.73% vs 12.55%). YTD: SGT leads (50.90% vs 35.86%). 1 year: SGT leads (48.24% vs 39.31%). Size (TRY): SGT leads (289.8M vs 261.9M). Investors: SGT leads (3,254 vs 816).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date OPF returned 35.86% and SGT returned 50.90%; over the last year OPF returned 39.31% and SGT returned 48.24%. Over the last month OPF returned −6.62% and SGT returned −2.54%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, OPF has a size of TRY 261.9M with 816 investors, while SGT has a size of TRY 289.8M with 3,254 investors. SGT leads in size and SGT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of OPF is 5 out of 7 and that of SGT is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.