Yatırımcı.AI

EIB vs SGT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EIB (Astra Portföy Değişken Fon) and SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

EIBSGT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EIB vs SGT Fund Comparison
MetricEIBSGTCategory median
Daily0.27%−5.30%−1.41%
1 week0.65%−0.60%−0.69%
1 month2.01%−2.54%−3.96%
3 months4.39%11.68%−1.43%
6 months19.72%38.73%1.85%
YTD33.43%50.90%17.97%
1 year40.68%48.24%23.69%
3 years224.42%—149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EIB vs SGT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EIB (Astra Portföy Değişken Fon) and SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EIB leads in 5 and SGT leads in 5. EIB is a Variable Fund fund managed by QInvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SGT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EIB leads (0.27% vs −5.30%). 1 week: EIB leads (0.65% vs −0.60%). 1 month: EIB leads (2.01% vs −2.54%). 3 months: SGT leads (11.68% vs 4.39%). 6 months: SGT leads (38.73% vs 19.72%). YTD: SGT leads (50.90% vs 33.43%). 1 year: SGT leads (48.24% vs 40.68%). Size (TRY): EIB leads (293.3M vs 289.8M). Investors: SGT leads (3,254 vs 393). Risk: EIB leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EIB returned 33.43% and SGT returned 50.90%; over the last year EIB returned 40.68% and SGT returned 48.24%. Over the last month EIB returned 2.01% and SGT returned −2.54%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, EIB has a size of TRY 293.3M with 393 investors, while SGT has a size of TRY 289.8M with 3,254 investors. EIB leads in size and SGT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EIB is 3 out of 7 and that of SGT is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.