Yatırımcı.AI

MTX vs YLC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MTX (TEB Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and YLC (Ata Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Değişken Fon) side by side.

MTXYLC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

MTX vs YLC Fund Comparison
MetricMTXYLCCategory median
Daily−3.69%−0.61%−1.41%
1 week−1.04%−1.24%−0.69%
1 month−8.72%−2.66%−3.96%
3 months−4.78%−6.61%−1.43%
6 months2.62%−2.90%1.85%
YTD6.56%17.92%17.97%
1 year7.41%23.34%23.69%
3 years181.14%69.47%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the MTX vs YLC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of MTX (TEB Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and YLC (Ata Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, MTX leads in 6 and YLC leads in 5. MTX is a Variable Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YLC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YLC leads (−0.61% vs −3.69%). 1 week: MTX leads (−1.04% vs −1.24%). 1 month: YLC leads (−2.66% vs −8.72%). 3 months: MTX leads (−4.78% vs −6.61%). 6 months: MTX leads (2.62% vs −2.90%). YTD: YLC leads (17.92% vs 6.56%). 1 year: YLC leads (23.34% vs 7.41%). 3 years: MTX leads (181.14% vs 69.47%). Size (TRY): MTX leads (65M vs 64.3M). Investors: MTX leads (1,836 vs 1,128). Risk: YLC leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date MTX returned 6.56% and YLC returned 17.92%; over the last year MTX returned 7.41% and YLC returned 23.34%. Over the last month MTX returned −8.72% and YLC returned −2.66%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, MTX has a size of TRY 65M with 1,836 investors, while YLC has a size of TRY 64.3M with 1,128 investors. MTX leads in size and MTX leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of MTX is 6 out of 7 and that of YLC is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.