Yatırımcı.AI

KVS vs NSD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KVS (Azimut Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and NSD (Nurol Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

KVSNSD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KVS vs NSD Fund Comparison
MetricKVSNSDCategory median
Daily0.30%0.19%0.16%
1 week0.70%0.51%0.46%
1 month3.25%2.06%1.10%
3 months10.01%6.24%3.53%
6 months22.38%13.94%8.53%
YTD39.10%21.25%16.18%
1 year48.12%24.97%19.94%
3 years253.64%109.99%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KVS vs NSD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KVS (Azimut Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and NSD (Nurol Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KVS leads in 9 and NSD leads in 1. KVS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NSD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KVS leads (0.30% vs 0.19%). 1 week: KVS leads (0.70% vs 0.51%). 1 month: KVS leads (3.25% vs 2.06%). 3 months: KVS leads (10.01% vs 6.24%). 6 months: KVS leads (22.38% vs 13.94%). YTD: KVS leads (39.10% vs 21.25%). 1 year: KVS leads (48.12% vs 24.97%). 3 years: KVS leads (253.64% vs 109.99%). Size (TRY): NSD leads (13B vs 12.2B). Investors: KVS leads (1,117 vs 122).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KVS returned 39.10% and NSD returned 21.25%; over the last year KVS returned 48.12% and NSD returned 24.97%. Over the last month KVS returned 3.25% and NSD returned 2.06%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, KVS has a size of TRY 12.2B with 1,117 investors, while NSD has a size of TRY 13B with 122 investors. NSD leads in size and KVS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KVS is 2 out of 7 and that of NSD is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.