Yatırımcı.AI

FBI vs NSD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBI (Fiba Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NSD (Nurol Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

FBINSD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FBI vs NSD Fund Comparison
MetricFBINSDCategory median
Daily0.18%0.19%0.16%
1 week0.50%0.51%0.46%
1 month2.07%2.06%1.10%
3 months6.00%6.24%3.53%
6 months12.52%13.94%8.53%
YTD19.37%21.25%16.18%
1 year22.75%24.97%19.94%
3 years95.03%109.99%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FBI vs NSD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FBI (Fiba Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NSD (Nurol Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FBI leads in 2 and NSD leads in 8. FBI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NSD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NSD leads (0.19% vs 0.18%). 1 week: NSD leads (0.51% vs 0.50%). 1 month: FBI leads (2.07% vs 2.06%). 3 months: NSD leads (6.24% vs 6.00%). 6 months: NSD leads (13.94% vs 12.52%). YTD: NSD leads (21.25% vs 19.37%). 1 year: NSD leads (24.97% vs 22.75%). 3 years: NSD leads (109.99% vs 95.03%). Size (TRY): NSD leads (13B vs 12.5B). Investors: FBI leads (4,482 vs 122).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FBI returned 19.37% and NSD returned 21.25%; over the last year FBI returned 22.75% and NSD returned 24.97%. Over the last month FBI returned 2.07% and NSD returned 2.06%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, FBI has a size of TRY 12.5B with 4,482 investors, while NSD has a size of TRY 13B with 122 investors. NSD leads in size and FBI leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FBI is — out of 7 and that of NSD is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.