Yatırımcı.AI

KIK vs ZBI Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KIK (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Katılım Fonu) and ZBI (Ziraat Portföy Temkinli Katılım Fonu) side by side.

KIKZBI
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KIK vs ZBI Fund Comparison
MetricKIKZBICategory median
Daily−1.16%−0.48%−0.18%
1 week0.94%−0.01%0.13%
1 month−6.07%−0.09%−0.64%
3 months−0.58%5.36%3.73%
6 months1.55%13.98%9.17%
YTD24.89%31.22%26.58%
1 year24.17%37.91%30.98%
3 years—26.57%166.05%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KIK vs ZBI Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KIK (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Katılım Fonu) and ZBI (Ziraat Portföy Temkinli Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KIK leads in 2 and ZBI leads in 8. KIK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZBI is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZBI leads (−0.48% vs −1.16%). 1 week: KIK leads (0.94% vs −0.01%). 1 month: ZBI leads (−0.09% vs −6.07%). 3 months: ZBI leads (5.36% vs −0.58%). 6 months: ZBI leads (13.98% vs 1.55%). YTD: ZBI leads (31.22% vs 24.89%). 1 year: ZBI leads (37.91% vs 24.17%). Size (TRY): KIK leads (135.8M vs 124.2M). Investors: ZBI leads (1,703 vs 1,215). Risk: ZBI leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KIK returned 24.89% and ZBI returned 31.22%; over the last year KIK returned 24.17% and ZBI returned 37.91%. Over the last month KIK returned −6.07% and ZBI returned −0.09%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, KIK has a size of TRY 135.8M with 1,215 investors, while ZBI has a size of TRY 124.2M with 1,703 investors. KIK leads in size and ZBI leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KIK is 6 out of 7 and that of ZBI is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.