FTL vs KIK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FTL (One Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and KIK (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FTL | KIK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.28% | −1.16% | −0.18% |
| 1 week | 0.66% | 0.94% | 0.13% |
| 1 month | 2.99% | −6.07% | −0.64% |
| 3 months | 9.45% | −0.58% | 3.73% |
| 6 months | 21.04% | 1.55% | 9.17% |
| YTD | 36.54% | 24.89% | 26.58% |
| 1 year | 44.82% | 24.17% | 30.98% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FTL vs KIK Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FTL (One Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and KIK (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FTL leads in 8 and KIK leads in 2. FTL is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Foneria Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KIK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FTL leads (0.28% vs −1.16%). 1 week: KIK leads (0.94% vs 0.66%). 1 month: FTL leads (2.99% vs −6.07%). 3 months: FTL leads (9.45% vs −0.58%). 6 months: FTL leads (21.04% vs 1.55%). YTD: FTL leads (36.54% vs 24.89%). 1 year: FTL leads (44.82% vs 24.17%). Size (TRY): FTL leads (139.7M vs 135.8M). Investors: KIK leads (1,215 vs 566). Risk: FTL leads (1 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FTL or KIK?
Year to date FTL returned 36.54% and KIK returned 24.89%; over the last year FTL returned 44.82% and KIK returned 24.17%. Over the last month FTL returned 2.99% and KIK returned −6.07%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FTL or KIK?
As of November 2, 2026, FTL has a size of TRY 139.7M with 566 investors, while KIK has a size of TRY 135.8M with 1,215 investors. FTL leads in size and KIK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FTL and KIK mean?
The CMB risk score of FTL is 1 out of 7 and that of KIK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.