Yatırımcı.AI

KDT vs YUN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KDT (Garanti Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and YUN (Yapı Kredi Portföy İstinye Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

KDTYUN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KDT vs YUN Fund Comparison
MetricKDTYUNCategory median
Daily0.25%0.18%0.16%
1 week0.67%0.50%0.46%
1 month2.71%1.66%1.10%
3 months5.96%5.73%3.53%
6 months12.77%13.29%8.53%
YTD18.98%20.09%16.18%
1 year23.12%24.72%19.94%
3 years22.99%103.67%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KDT vs YUN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KDT (Garanti Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and YUN (Yapı Kredi Portföy İstinye Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KDT leads in 6 and YUN leads in 4. KDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YUN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KDT leads (0.25% vs 0.18%). 1 week: KDT leads (0.67% vs 0.50%). 1 month: KDT leads (2.71% vs 1.66%). 3 months: KDT leads (5.96% vs 5.73%). 6 months: YUN leads (13.29% vs 12.77%). YTD: YUN leads (20.09% vs 18.98%). 1 year: YUN leads (24.72% vs 23.12%). 3 years: YUN leads (103.67% vs 22.99%). Size (TRY): KDT leads (3.1B vs 3.1B). Investors: KDT leads (1,045 vs 625).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KDT returned 18.98% and YUN returned 20.09%; over the last year KDT returned 23.12% and YUN returned 24.72%. Over the last month KDT returned 2.71% and YUN returned 1.66%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, KDT has a size of TRY 3.1B with 1,045 investors, while YUN has a size of TRY 3.1B with 625 investors. KDT leads in size and KDT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KDT is — out of 7 and that of YUN is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.