Yatırımcı.AI

IOG vs PKT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IOG (İş Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

IOGPKT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IOG vs PKT Fund Comparison
MetricIOGPKTCategory median
Daily−6.51%0.29%0.16%
1 week−5.94%0.67%0.46%
1 month−14.43%3.12%1.10%
3 months−7.48%9.65%3.53%
6 months−21.15%21.55%8.53%
YTD−23.17%37.33%16.18%
1 year17.65%45.82%19.94%
3 years275.34%—103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IOG vs PKT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IOG (İş Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IOG leads in 2 and PKT leads in 8. IOG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PKT leads (0.29% vs −6.51%). 1 week: PKT leads (0.67% vs −5.94%). 1 month: PKT leads (3.12% vs −14.43%). 3 months: PKT leads (9.65% vs −7.48%). 6 months: PKT leads (21.55% vs −21.15%). YTD: PKT leads (37.33% vs −23.17%). 1 year: PKT leads (45.82% vs 17.65%). Size (TRY): IOG leads (8.6B vs 8.6B). Investors: IOG leads (16,669 vs 1,554). Risk: PKT leads (2 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IOG returned −23.17% and PKT returned 37.33%; over the last year IOG returned 17.65% and PKT returned 45.82%. Over the last month IOG returned −14.43% and PKT returned 3.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, IOG has a size of TRY 8.6B with 16,669 investors, while PKT has a size of TRY 8.6B with 1,554 investors. IOG leads in size and IOG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IOG is 7 out of 7 and that of PKT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.