Yatırımcı.AI

IML vs SAS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IML (İş Portföy Model Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and SAS (Ak Portföy Sabancı Topluluğu Şirketleri Endeksi Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

IMLSAS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IML vs SAS Fund Comparison
MetricIMLSASCategory median
Today (est.)1.69%2.59%1.79%
Daily−3.53%−3.33%−3.03%
1 week−3.36%−3.70%−3.00%
1 month−12.45%−6.78%−11.63%
3 months−13.94%−7.85%−13.94%
6 months−12.93%−16.88%−14.98%
YTD2.30%−1.10%2.54%
1 year8.03%3.66%4.18%
3 years—33.61%79.59%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 2, 2026, 16:38.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IML vs SAS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IML (İş Portföy Model Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and SAS (Ak Portföy Sabancı Topluluğu Şirketleri Endeksi Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IML leads in 5 and SAS leads in 6. IML is a Stock Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SAS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Today (est.): SAS leads (2.59% vs 1.69%). Daily: SAS leads (−3.33% vs −3.53%). 1 week: IML leads (−3.36% vs −3.70%). 1 month: SAS leads (−6.78% vs −12.45%). 3 months: SAS leads (−7.85% vs −13.94%). 6 months: IML leads (−12.93% vs −16.88%). YTD: IML leads (2.30% vs −1.10%). 1 year: IML leads (8.03% vs 3.66%). Size (TRY): IML leads (688.6M vs 680.6M). Investors: SAS leads (37,688 vs 3,541). Risk: SAS leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IML returned 2.30% and SAS returned −1.10%; over the last year IML returned 8.03% and SAS returned 3.66%. Over the last month IML returned −12.45% and SAS returned −6.78%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, IML has a size of TRY 688.6M with 3,541 investors, while SAS has a size of TRY 680.6M with 37,688 investors. IML leads in size and SAS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IML is 6 out of 7 and that of SAS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.