IKL vs KRR Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IKL (İş Portföy Sağlık Şirketleri Karma Fon) and KRR (İş Portföy Karma Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | IKL | KRR | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | 1.53% | 1.53% |
| Daily | 2.72% | −2.18% | −0.85% |
| 1 week | 2.95% | −1.67% | −0.48% |
| 1 month | 8.39% | −5.97% | −1.96% |
| 3 months | 12.54% | −3.16% | 1.89% |
| 6 months | 25.80% | −3.43% | 8.31% |
| YTD | 27.49% | 2.66% | 19.33% |
| 1 year | 38.24% | — | 24.17% |
| 3 years | 157.84% | — | 177.07% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the IKL vs KRR Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IKL (İş Portföy Sağlık Şirketleri Karma Fon) and KRR (İş Portföy Karma Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, IKL leads in 8 and KRR leads in 1. IKL is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KRR is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: IKL leads (2.72% vs −2.18%). 1 week: IKL leads (2.95% vs −1.67%). 1 month: IKL leads (8.39% vs −5.97%). 3 months: IKL leads (12.54% vs −3.16%). 6 months: IKL leads (25.80% vs −3.43%). YTD: IKL leads (27.49% vs 2.66%). Size (TRY): IKL leads (272M vs 18M). Investors: IKL leads (4,988 vs 517). Risk: KRR leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, IKL or KRR?
Year to date IKL returned 27.49% and KRR returned 2.66%; over the last year IKL returned 38.24% and KRR returned —. Over the last month IKL returned 8.39% and KRR returned −5.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IKL or KRR?
As of November 2, 2026, IKL has a size of TRY 272M with 4,988 investors, while KRR has a size of TRY 18M with 517 investors. IKL leads in size and IKL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IKL and KRR mean?
The CMB risk score of IKL is 6 out of 7 and that of KRR is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.