Yatırımcı.AI

ANE vs IKL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ANE (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IKL (İş Portföy Sağlık Şirketleri Karma Fon) side by side.

ANEIKL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ANE vs IKL Fund Comparison
MetricANEIKLCategory median
Daily−0.85%2.72%−0.85%
1 week−0.73%2.95%−0.48%
1 month−2.26%8.39%−1.96%
3 months−1.87%12.54%1.89%
6 months1.91%25.80%8.31%
YTD16.71%27.49%19.33%
1 year25.13%38.24%24.17%
3 years128.29%157.84%177.07%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ANE vs IKL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ANE (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IKL (İş Portföy Sağlık Şirketleri Karma Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ANE leads in 2 and IKL leads in 9. ANE is a Mixed Fund fund managed by Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; IKL is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IKL leads (2.72% vs −0.85%). 1 week: IKL leads (2.95% vs −0.73%). 1 month: IKL leads (8.39% vs −2.26%). 3 months: IKL leads (12.54% vs −1.87%). 6 months: IKL leads (25.80% vs 1.91%). YTD: IKL leads (27.49% vs 16.71%). 1 year: IKL leads (38.24% vs 25.13%). 3 years: IKL leads (157.84% vs 128.29%). Size (TRY): IKL leads (272M vs 110M). Investors: ANE leads (22,179 vs 4,988). Risk: ANE leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ANE returned 16.71% and IKL returned 27.49%; over the last year ANE returned 25.13% and IKL returned 38.24%. Over the last month ANE returned −2.26% and IKL returned 8.39%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, ANE has a size of TRY 110M with 22,179 investors, while IKL has a size of TRY 272M with 4,988 investors. IKL leads in size and ANE leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ANE is 4 out of 7 and that of IKL is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.