Yatırımcı.AI

HVU vs KIB Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HVU (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and KIB (Trive Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

HVUKIB
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

HVU vs KIB Fund Comparison
MetricHVUKIBCategory median
Today (est.)1.22%—1.38%
Daily−1.42%−4.19%−1.41%
1 week−1.25%−2.31%−0.69%
1 month−9.02%−12.25%−3.96%
3 months−9.58%−9.07%−1.43%
6 months−5.62%−5.62%1.85%
YTD6.06%0.89%17.97%
1 year10.27%−1.37%23.69%
3 years100.73%126.15%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 2, 2026, 16:38.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the HVU vs KIB Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of HVU (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and KIB (Trive Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, HVU leads in 7 and KIB leads in 4. HVU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; KIB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Trive Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: HVU leads (−1.42% vs −4.19%). 1 week: HVU leads (−1.25% vs −2.31%). 1 month: HVU leads (−9.02% vs −12.25%). 3 months: KIB leads (−9.07% vs −9.58%). 6 months: HVU leads (−5.62% vs −5.62%). YTD: HVU leads (6.06% vs 0.89%). 1 year: HVU leads (10.27% vs −1.37%). 3 years: KIB leads (126.15% vs 100.73%). Size (TRY): KIB leads (7.4M vs 6.2M). Investors: KIB leads (898 vs 635). Risk: HVU leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date HVU returned 6.06% and KIB returned 0.89%; over the last year HVU returned 10.27% and KIB returned −1.37%. Over the last month HVU returned −9.02% and KIB returned −12.25%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, HVU has a size of TRY 6.2M with 635 investors, while KIB has a size of TRY 7.4M with 898 investors. KIB leads in size and KIB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of HVU is 4 out of 7 and that of KIB is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.