Yatırımcı.AI

HPD vs SGT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HPD (HSBC Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

HPDSGT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

HPD vs SGT Fund Comparison
MetricHPDSGTCategory median
Today (est.)0.75%—1.53%
Daily−1.61%−5.30%−1.41%
1 week−0.70%−0.60%−0.69%
1 month−3.99%−2.54%−3.96%
3 months0.19%11.68%−1.43%
6 months−1.89%38.73%1.85%
YTD11.21%50.90%17.97%
1 year11.28%48.24%23.69%
3 years100.19%—149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 2, 2026, 17:36.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the HPD vs SGT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of HPD (HSBC Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, HPD leads in 1 and SGT leads in 8. HPD is a Variable Fund fund managed by HSBC Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SGT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: HPD leads (−1.61% vs −5.30%). 1 week: SGT leads (−0.60% vs −0.70%). 1 month: SGT leads (−2.54% vs −3.99%). 3 months: SGT leads (11.68% vs 0.19%). 6 months: SGT leads (38.73% vs −1.89%). YTD: SGT leads (50.90% vs 11.21%). 1 year: SGT leads (48.24% vs 11.28%). Size (TRY): SGT leads (289.8M vs 258M). Investors: SGT leads (3,254 vs 1,380).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date HPD returned 11.21% and SGT returned 50.90%; over the last year HPD returned 11.28% and SGT returned 48.24%. Over the last month HPD returned −3.99% and SGT returned −2.54%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, HPD has a size of TRY 258M with 1,380 investors, while SGT has a size of TRY 289.8M with 3,254 investors. SGT leads in size and SGT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of HPD is — out of 7 and that of SGT is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.