HBF vs RPG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HBF (HSBC Portföy Altın Fonu) and RPG (Rota Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | HBF | RPG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.53% | −1.19% | −0.32% |
| 1 week | −0.81% | −3.30% | −0.74% |
| 1 month | −3.12% | −3.83% | −3.05% |
| 3 months | 2.66% | 2.86% | 2.83% |
| 6 months | −3.64% | −3.69% | −4.12% |
| YTD | 2.75% | 2.84% | 2.06% |
| 1 year | 14.65% | 13.24% | 12.48% |
| 3 years | 247.98% | 225.15% | 236.27% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the HBF vs RPG Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of HBF (HSBC Portföy Altın Fonu) and RPG (Rota Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, HBF leads in 8 and RPG leads in 2. HBF is a Gold Fund fund managed by HSBC Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPG is a Gold Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: HBF leads (−0.53% vs −1.19%). 1 week: HBF leads (−0.81% vs −3.30%). 1 month: HBF leads (−3.12% vs −3.83%). 3 months: RPG leads (2.86% vs 2.66%). 6 months: HBF leads (−3.64% vs −3.69%). YTD: RPG leads (2.84% vs 2.75%). 1 year: HBF leads (14.65% vs 13.24%). 3 years: HBF leads (247.98% vs 225.15%). Size (TRY): HBF leads (5.7B vs 811.5M). Investors: HBF leads (9,835 vs 1,220).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, HBF or RPG?
Year to date HBF returned 2.75% and RPG returned 2.84%; over the last year HBF returned 14.65% and RPG returned 13.24%. Over the last month HBF returned −3.12% and RPG returned −3.83%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, HBF or RPG?
As of November 2, 2026, HBF has a size of TRY 5.7B with 9,835 investors, while RPG has a size of TRY 811.5M with 1,220 investors. HBF leads in size and HBF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of HBF and RPG mean?
The CMB risk score of HBF is — out of 7 and that of RPG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.