FIB vs HBF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIB (Fiba Portföy Altın Fonu) and HBF (HSBC Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FIB | HBF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.17% | −0.53% | −0.32% |
| 1 week | −0.52% | −0.81% | −0.74% |
| 1 month | −2.67% | −3.12% | −3.05% |
| 3 months | 3.00% | 2.66% | 2.83% |
| 6 months | −4.44% | −3.64% | −4.12% |
| YTD | 1.44% | 2.75% | 2.06% |
| 1 year | 12.15% | 14.65% | 12.48% |
| 3 years | 233.02% | 247.98% | 236.27% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FIB vs HBF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FIB (Fiba Portföy Altın Fonu) and HBF (HSBC Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FIB leads in 5 and HBF leads in 5. FIB is a Gold Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; HBF is a Gold Fund fund managed by HSBC Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FIB leads (−0.17% vs −0.53%). 1 week: FIB leads (−0.52% vs −0.81%). 1 month: FIB leads (−2.67% vs −3.12%). 3 months: FIB leads (3.00% vs 2.66%). 6 months: HBF leads (−3.64% vs −4.44%). YTD: HBF leads (2.75% vs 1.44%). 1 year: HBF leads (14.65% vs 12.15%). 3 years: HBF leads (247.98% vs 233.02%). Size (TRY): HBF leads (5.7B vs 4.3B). Investors: FIB leads (11,340 vs 9,835).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FIB or HBF?
Year to date FIB returned 1.44% and HBF returned 2.75%; over the last year FIB returned 12.15% and HBF returned 14.65%. Over the last month FIB returned −2.67% and HBF returned −3.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FIB or HBF?
As of November 2, 2026, FIB has a size of TRY 4.3B with 11,340 investors, while HBF has a size of TRY 5.7B with 9,835 investors. HBF leads in size and FIB leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FIB and HBF mean?
The CMB risk score of FIB is 6 out of 7 and that of HBF is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.