GRL vs NKA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and NKA (Neo Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GRL | NKA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.15% | 0.17% | 0.16% |
| 1 week | 1.13% | 0.48% | 0.46% |
| 1 month | −0.09% | 1.91% | 1.10% |
| 3 months | 2.55% | 5.76% | 3.53% |
| 6 months | 1.73% | 11.98% | 8.53% |
| YTD | 17.43% | 18.54% | 16.18% |
| 1 year | 27.38% | 21.58% | 19.94% |
| 3 years | 17.37% | — | 103.56% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GRL vs NKA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and NKA (Neo Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GRL leads in 4 and NKA leads in 6. GRL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NKA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NKA leads (0.17% vs −0.15%). 1 week: GRL leads (1.13% vs 0.48%). 1 month: NKA leads (1.91% vs −0.09%). 3 months: NKA leads (5.76% vs 2.55%). 6 months: NKA leads (11.98% vs 1.73%). YTD: NKA leads (18.54% vs 17.43%). 1 year: GRL leads (27.38% vs 21.58%). Size (TRY): GRL leads (135.7M vs 134.4M). Investors: GRL leads (233 vs 8). Risk: NKA leads (3 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GRL or NKA?
Year to date GRL returned 17.43% and NKA returned 18.54%; over the last year GRL returned 27.38% and NKA returned 21.58%. Over the last month GRL returned −0.09% and NKA returned 1.91%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GRL or NKA?
As of November 2, 2026, GRL has a size of TRY 135.7M with 233 investors, while NKA has a size of TRY 134.4M with 8 investors. GRL leads in size and GRL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GRL and NKA mean?
The CMB risk score of GRL is 5 out of 7 and that of NKA is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.