Yatırımcı.AI

GPG vs TI7 Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPG (Inveo Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and TI7 (İş Portföy Dengeli Değişken Fon) side by side.

GPGTI7
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GPG vs TI7 Fund Comparison
MetricGPGTI7Category median
Daily2.75%−0.71%−1.41%
1 week3.83%−0.02%−0.69%
1 month9.24%−2.93%−3.96%
3 months2.80%2.97%−1.43%
6 months17.79%8.73%1.85%
YTD38.30%13.74%17.97%
1 year45.39%25.97%23.69%
3 years206.30%135.96%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GPG vs TI7 Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GPG (Inveo Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and TI7 (İş Portföy Dengeli Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GPG leads in 7 and TI7 leads in 4. GPG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TI7 is a Variable Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GPG leads (2.75% vs −0.71%). 1 week: GPG leads (3.83% vs −0.02%). 1 month: GPG leads (9.24% vs −2.93%). 3 months: TI7 leads (2.97% vs 2.80%). 6 months: GPG leads (17.79% vs 8.73%). YTD: GPG leads (38.30% vs 13.74%). 1 year: GPG leads (45.39% vs 25.97%). 3 years: GPG leads (206.30% vs 135.96%). Size (TRY): TI7 leads (1.1B vs 933.9M). Investors: TI7 leads (9,131 vs 2,327). Risk: TI7 leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GPG returned 38.30% and TI7 returned 13.74%; over the last year GPG returned 45.39% and TI7 returned 25.97%. Over the last month GPG returned 9.24% and TI7 returned −2.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, GPG has a size of TRY 933.9M with 2,327 investors, while TI7 has a size of TRY 1.1B with 9,131 investors. TI7 leads in size and TI7 leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GPG is 6 out of 7 and that of TI7 is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.