Yatırımcı.AI

GPG vs ZBD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPG (Inveo Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and ZBD (Ziraat Portföy Dengeli Değişken Fon) side by side.

GPGZBD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GPG vs ZBD Fund Comparison
MetricGPGZBDCategory median
Daily2.75%−1.65%−1.41%
1 week3.83%−1.60%−0.69%
1 month9.24%−4.33%−3.96%
3 months2.80%−2.59%−1.43%
6 months17.79%−2.10%1.85%
YTD38.30%8.77%17.97%
1 year45.39%14.82%23.69%
3 years206.30%94.56%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GPG vs ZBD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GPG (Inveo Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and ZBD (Ziraat Portföy Dengeli Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GPG leads in 10 and ZBD leads in 0. GPG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZBD is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GPG leads (2.75% vs −1.65%). 1 week: GPG leads (3.83% vs −1.60%). 1 month: GPG leads (9.24% vs −4.33%). 3 months: GPG leads (2.80% vs −2.59%). 6 months: GPG leads (17.79% vs −2.10%). YTD: GPG leads (38.30% vs 8.77%). 1 year: GPG leads (45.39% vs 14.82%). 3 years: GPG leads (206.30% vs 94.56%). Size (TRY): GPG leads (933.9M vs 863M). Investors: GPG leads (2,327 vs 1,968).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GPG returned 38.30% and ZBD returned 8.77%; over the last year GPG returned 45.39% and ZBD returned 14.82%. Over the last month GPG returned 9.24% and ZBD returned −4.33%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, GPG has a size of TRY 933.9M with 2,327 investors, while ZBD has a size of TRY 863M with 1,968 investors. GPG leads in size and GPG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GPG is 6 out of 7 and that of ZBD is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.