GLS vs ZCK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GLS (Azimut Portföy Kira Sertifikaları (Sukuk) Katılım Fonu) and ZCK (Ziraat Portföy Agresif Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GLS | ZCK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.27% | −3.61% | −0.18% |
| 1 week | 0.66% | −3.15% | 0.13% |
| 1 month | 2.93% | −13.50% | −0.64% |
| 3 months | 9.20% | −14.88% | 3.73% |
| 6 months | 19.71% | −11.30% | 9.17% |
| YTD | 35.67% | 7.46% | 26.58% |
| 1 year | 43.26% | 8.14% | 30.98% |
| 3 years | 215.42% | 12.91% | 166.05% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GLS vs ZCK Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GLS (Azimut Portföy Kira Sertifikaları (Sukuk) Katılım Fonu) and ZCK (Ziraat Portföy Agresif Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GLS leads in 10 and ZCK leads in 1. GLS is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZCK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GLS leads (0.27% vs −3.61%). 1 week: GLS leads (0.66% vs −3.15%). 1 month: GLS leads (2.93% vs −13.50%). 3 months: GLS leads (9.20% vs −14.88%). 6 months: GLS leads (19.71% vs −11.30%). YTD: GLS leads (35.67% vs 7.46%). 1 year: GLS leads (43.26% vs 8.14%). 3 years: GLS leads (215.42% vs 12.91%). Size (TRY): GLS leads (331.5M vs 310.5M). Investors: ZCK leads (2,194 vs 1,347). Risk: GLS leads (2 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GLS or ZCK?
Year to date GLS returned 35.67% and ZCK returned 7.46%; over the last year GLS returned 43.26% and ZCK returned 8.14%. Over the last month GLS returned 2.93% and ZCK returned −13.50%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GLS or ZCK?
As of November 2, 2026, GLS has a size of TRY 331.5M with 1,347 investors, while ZCK has a size of TRY 310.5M with 2,194 investors. GLS leads in size and ZCK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GLS and ZCK mean?
The CMB risk score of GLS is 2 out of 7 and that of ZCK is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.