GLS vs KTN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GLS (Azimut Portföy Kira Sertifikaları (Sukuk) Katılım Fonu) and KTN (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım (TL) Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GLS | KTN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.27% | 0.25% | −0.18% |
| 1 week | 0.66% | 0.60% | 0.13% |
| 1 month | 2.93% | 2.73% | −0.64% |
| 3 months | 9.20% | 5.63% | 3.73% |
| 6 months | 19.71% | 12.82% | 9.17% |
| YTD | 35.67% | 26.38% | 26.58% |
| 1 year | 43.26% | 33.69% | 30.98% |
| 3 years | 215.42% | 158.11% | 166.05% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GLS vs KTN Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GLS (Azimut Portföy Kira Sertifikaları (Sukuk) Katılım Fonu) and KTN (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GLS leads in 8 and KTN leads in 2. GLS is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KTN is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GLS leads (0.27% vs 0.25%). 1 week: GLS leads (0.66% vs 0.60%). 1 month: GLS leads (2.93% vs 2.73%). 3 months: GLS leads (9.20% vs 5.63%). 6 months: GLS leads (19.71% vs 12.82%). YTD: GLS leads (35.67% vs 26.38%). 1 year: GLS leads (43.26% vs 33.69%). 3 years: GLS leads (215.42% vs 158.11%). Size (TRY): KTN leads (332.3M vs 331.5M). Investors: KTN leads (3,976 vs 1,347).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GLS or KTN?
Year to date GLS returned 35.67% and KTN returned 26.38%; over the last year GLS returned 43.26% and KTN returned 33.69%. Over the last month GLS returned 2.93% and KTN returned 2.73%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GLS or KTN?
As of November 2, 2026, GLS has a size of TRY 331.5M with 1,347 investors, while KTN has a size of TRY 332.3M with 3,976 investors. KTN leads in size and KTN leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GLS and KTN mean?
The CMB risk score of GLS is 2 out of 7 and that of KTN is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.