FZP vs ZVO Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) and ZVO (Ziraat Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FZP | ZVO | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.17% | −3.86% | 0.16% |
| 1 week | 0.09% | −3.81% | 0.46% |
| 1 month | 0.55% | −11.65% | 1.10% |
| 3 months | 4.43% | −8.15% | 3.53% |
| 6 months | 12.73% | −8.25% | 8.53% |
| YTD | 26.73% | −20.72% | 16.18% |
| 1 year | 34.39% | −23.34% | 19.94% |
| 3 years | 225.63% | 36.72% | 103.56% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FZP vs ZVO Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) and ZVO (Ziraat Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FZP leads in 11 and ZVO leads in 0. FZP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZVO is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FZP leads (−0.17% vs −3.86%). 1 week: FZP leads (0.09% vs −3.81%). 1 month: FZP leads (0.55% vs −11.65%). 3 months: FZP leads (4.43% vs −8.15%). 6 months: FZP leads (12.73% vs −8.25%). YTD: FZP leads (26.73% vs −20.72%). 1 year: FZP leads (34.39% vs −23.34%). 3 years: FZP leads (225.63% vs 36.72%). Size (TRY): FZP leads (731.6M vs 721.2M). Investors: FZP leads (459 vs 274). Risk: FZP leads (3 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FZP or ZVO?
Year to date FZP returned 26.73% and ZVO returned −20.72%; over the last year FZP returned 34.39% and ZVO returned −23.34%. Over the last month FZP returned 0.55% and ZVO returned −11.65%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FZP or ZVO?
As of November 2, 2026, FZP has a size of TRY 731.6M with 459 investors, while ZVO has a size of TRY 721.2M with 274 investors. FZP leads in size and FZP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FZP and ZVO mean?
The CMB risk score of FZP is 3 out of 7 and that of ZVO is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.