FSF vs KVS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSF (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and KVS (Azimut Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FSF | KVS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.29% | 0.30% | 0.16% |
| 1 week | 0.67% | 0.70% | 0.46% |
| 1 month | 3.05% | 3.25% | 1.10% |
| 3 months | 9.60% | 10.01% | 3.53% |
| 6 months | 21.41% | 22.38% | 8.53% |
| YTD | 37.21% | 39.10% | 16.18% |
| 1 year | 45.74% | 48.12% | 19.94% |
| 3 years | 263.07% | 253.64% | 103.56% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FSF vs KVS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FSF (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and KVS (Azimut Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FSF leads in 2 and KVS leads in 8. FSF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KVS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KVS leads (0.30% vs 0.29%). 1 week: KVS leads (0.70% vs 0.67%). 1 month: KVS leads (3.25% vs 3.05%). 3 months: KVS leads (10.01% vs 9.60%). 6 months: KVS leads (22.38% vs 21.41%). YTD: KVS leads (39.10% vs 37.21%). 1 year: KVS leads (48.12% vs 45.74%). 3 years: FSF leads (263.07% vs 253.64%). Size (TRY): KVS leads (12.2B vs 11.3B). Investors: FSF leads (7,207 vs 1,117).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FSF or KVS?
Year to date FSF returned 37.21% and KVS returned 39.10%; over the last year FSF returned 45.74% and KVS returned 48.12%. Over the last month FSF returned 3.05% and KVS returned 3.25%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FSF or KVS?
As of November 2, 2026, FSF has a size of TRY 11.3B with 7,207 investors, while KVS has a size of TRY 12.2B with 1,117 investors. KVS leads in size and FSF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FSF and KVS mean?
The CMB risk score of FSF is 2 out of 7 and that of KVS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.