Yatırımcı.AI

FMG vs IOG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FMG (QNB Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and IOG (İş Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) side by side.

FMGIOG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FMG vs IOG Fund Comparison
MetricFMGIOGCategory median
Daily−5.86%−6.51%0.16%
1 week−8.59%−5.94%0.46%
1 month−14.27%−14.43%1.10%
3 months−7.75%−7.48%3.53%
6 months−23.37%−21.15%8.53%
YTD−21.75%−23.17%16.18%
1 year20.57%17.65%19.94%
3 years38.30%275.34%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FMG vs IOG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FMG (QNB Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and IOG (İş Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FMG leads in 6 and IOG leads in 5. FMG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IOG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FMG leads (−5.86% vs −6.51%). 1 week: IOG leads (−5.94% vs −8.59%). 1 month: FMG leads (−14.27% vs −14.43%). 3 months: IOG leads (−7.48% vs −7.75%). 6 months: IOG leads (−21.15% vs −23.37%). YTD: FMG leads (−21.75% vs −23.17%). 1 year: FMG leads (20.57% vs 17.65%). 3 years: IOG leads (275.34% vs 38.30%). Size (TRY): FMG leads (9.7B vs 8.6B). Investors: IOG leads (16,669 vs 9,142). Risk: FMG leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FMG returned −21.75% and IOG returned −23.17%; over the last year FMG returned 20.57% and IOG returned 17.65%. Over the last month FMG returned −14.27% and IOG returned −14.43%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, FMG has a size of TRY 9.7B with 9,142 investors, while IOG has a size of TRY 8.6B with 16,669 investors. FMG leads in size and IOG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FMG is 6 out of 7 and that of IOG is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.