Yatırımcı.AI

FIV vs MHO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIV (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHO (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

FIVMHO
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FIV vs MHO Fund Comparison
MetricFIVMHOCategory median
Daily−2.66%−1.88%−1.41%
1 week−2.87%−2.23%−0.69%
1 month−9.79%−5.59%−3.96%
3 months−6.83%−2.87%−1.43%
6 months−1.27%−0.57%1.85%
YTD19.81%17.98%17.97%
1 year21.75%23.76%23.69%
3 years123.22%167.48%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FIV vs MHO Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FIV (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHO (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FIV leads in 2 and MHO leads in 9. FIV is a Variable Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MHO is a Variable Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MHO leads (−1.88% vs −2.66%). 1 week: MHO leads (−2.23% vs −2.87%). 1 month: MHO leads (−5.59% vs −9.79%). 3 months: MHO leads (−2.87% vs −6.83%). 6 months: MHO leads (−0.57% vs −1.27%). YTD: FIV leads (19.81% vs 17.98%). 1 year: MHO leads (23.76% vs 21.75%). 3 years: MHO leads (167.48% vs 123.22%). Size (TRY): MHO leads (49.1M vs 46.8M). Investors: FIV leads (809 vs 493). Risk: MHO leads (5 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FIV returned 19.81% and MHO returned 17.98%; over the last year FIV returned 21.75% and MHO returned 23.76%. Over the last month FIV returned −9.79% and MHO returned −5.59%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, FIV has a size of TRY 46.8M with 809 investors, while MHO has a size of TRY 49.1M with 493 investors. MHO leads in size and FIV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FIV is 7 out of 7 and that of MHO is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.