Yatırımcı.AI

FFZ vs FOA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FFZ (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Inveo Portföy Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FOA (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Azimut Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

FFZFOA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FFZ vs FOA Fund Comparison
MetricFFZFOACategory median
Daily−1.30%−0.78%−1.33%
1 week−0.68%−0.39%−0.68%
1 month−4.93%−1.37%−2.96%
3 months−3.34%3.61%0.00%
6 months−1.95%10.19%2.05%
YTD8.21%30.49%17.79%
1 year15.70%37.44%24.45%
3 years156.16%—158.82%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FFZ vs FOA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FFZ (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Inveo Portföy Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FOA (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Azimut Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FFZ leads in 0 and FOA leads in 9. FFZ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; FOA is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FOA leads (−0.78% vs −1.30%). 1 week: FOA leads (−0.39% vs −0.68%). 1 month: FOA leads (−1.37% vs −4.93%). 3 months: FOA leads (3.61% vs −3.34%). 6 months: FOA leads (10.19% vs −1.95%). YTD: FOA leads (30.49% vs 8.21%). 1 year: FOA leads (37.44% vs 15.70%). Size (TRY): FOA leads (397.1M vs 356.2M). Investors: FOA leads (4,783 vs 3,734).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FFZ returned 8.21% and FOA returned 30.49%; over the last year FFZ returned 15.70% and FOA returned 37.44%. Over the last month FFZ returned −4.93% and FOA returned −1.37%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, FFZ has a size of TRY 356.2M with 3,734 investors, while FOA has a size of TRY 397.1M with 4,783 investors. FOA leads in size and FOA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FFZ is 4 out of 7 and that of FOA is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.