Yatırımcı.AI

FFP vs HFS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FFP (QNB Portföy Fon Sepeti Fonu) and HFS (Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. HSBC Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

FFPHFS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FFP vs HFS Fund Comparison
MetricFFPHFSCategory median
Daily−0.60%−2.22%−1.33%
1 week−0.38%−1.13%−0.68%
1 month−0.78%−5.81%−2.96%
3 months4.27%−2.85%0.00%
6 months5.55%−0.86%2.05%
YTD15.05%18.02%17.79%
1 year26.93%20.35%24.45%
3 years178.07%—158.82%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FFP vs HFS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FFP (QNB Portföy Fon Sepeti Fonu) and HFS (Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. HSBC Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FFP leads in 8 and HFS leads in 2. FFP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; HFS is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FFP leads (−0.60% vs −2.22%). 1 week: FFP leads (−0.38% vs −1.13%). 1 month: FFP leads (−0.78% vs −5.81%). 3 months: FFP leads (4.27% vs −2.85%). 6 months: FFP leads (5.55% vs −0.86%). YTD: HFS leads (18.02% vs 15.05%). 1 year: FFP leads (26.93% vs 20.35%). Size (TRY): HFS leads (1.8B vs 1.8B). Investors: FFP leads (2,133 vs 2,048). Risk: FFP leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FFP returned 15.05% and HFS returned 18.02%; over the last year FFP returned 26.93% and HFS returned 20.35%. Over the last month FFP returned −0.78% and HFS returned −5.81%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, FFP has a size of TRY 1.8B with 2,133 investors, while HFS has a size of TRY 1.8B with 2,048 investors. HFS leads in size and FFP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FFP is 4 out of 7 and that of HFS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.