Yatırımcı.AI

FFP vs GZJ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FFP (QNB Portföy Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GZJ (Garanti Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

FFPGZJ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FFP vs GZJ Fund Comparison
MetricFFPGZJCategory median
Daily−0.60%−0.32%−1.33%
1 week−0.38%−0.11%−0.68%
1 month−0.78%−2.92%−2.96%
3 months4.27%0.46%0.00%
6 months5.55%3.15%2.05%
YTD15.05%15.87%17.79%
1 year26.93%22.47%24.45%
3 years178.07%177.48%158.82%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FFP vs GZJ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FFP (QNB Portföy Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GZJ (Garanti Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FFP leads in 6 and GZJ leads in 4. FFP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GZJ leads (−0.32% vs −0.60%). 1 week: GZJ leads (−0.11% vs −0.38%). 1 month: FFP leads (−0.78% vs −2.92%). 3 months: FFP leads (4.27% vs 0.46%). 6 months: FFP leads (5.55% vs 3.15%). YTD: GZJ leads (15.87% vs 15.05%). 1 year: FFP leads (26.93% vs 22.47%). 3 years: FFP leads (178.07% vs 177.48%). Size (TRY): FFP leads (1.8B vs 1.5B). Investors: GZJ leads (4,610 vs 2,133).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FFP returned 15.05% and GZJ returned 15.87%; over the last year FFP returned 26.93% and GZJ returned 22.47%. Over the last month FFP returned −0.78% and GZJ returned −2.92%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, FFP has a size of TRY 1.8B with 2,133 investors, while GZJ has a size of TRY 1.5B with 4,610 investors. FFP leads in size and GZJ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FFP is 4 out of 7 and that of GZJ is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.