Yatırımcı.AI

EPT vs PPT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EPT (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPT (Atlas Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

SPK decided to liquidate PPT in bulletin 2026/60 dated September 17, 2026; no buy or redemption orders are executed in the fund. Its returns in this comparison are based on the last price published on TEFAS (November 2, 2026). PPT fund page · SPK bulletin 2026/60

EPTPPT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EPT vs PPT Fund Comparison
MetricEPTPPTCategory median
Daily0.29%−38.19%0.29%
1 week0.68%−40.55%0.68%
1 month3.10%−39.77%3.04%
3 months9.63%−36.16%9.49%
6 months21.40%−28.56%21.05%
YTD37.30%−18.01%36.77%
1 year—−12.30%45.27%
3 years—81.53%255.19%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EPT vs PPT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EPT (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPT (Atlas Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EPT leads in 8 and PPT leads in 1. EPT is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPT is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Atlas Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EPT leads (0.29% vs −38.19%). 1 week: EPT leads (0.68% vs −40.55%). 1 month: EPT leads (3.10% vs −39.77%). 3 months: EPT leads (9.63% vs −36.16%). 6 months: EPT leads (21.40% vs −28.56%). YTD: EPT leads (37.30% vs −18.01%). Size (TRY): EPT leads (1.3B vs 1.1B). Investors: PPT leads (3,818 vs 59). Risk: EPT leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EPT returned 37.30% and PPT returned −18.01%; over the last year EPT returned — and PPT returned −12.30%. Over the last month EPT returned 3.10% and PPT returned −39.77%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, EPT has a size of TRY 1.3B with 59 investors, while PPT has a size of TRY 1.1B with 3,818 investors. EPT leads in size and PPT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EPT is 1 out of 7 and that of PPT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.