EPP vs TPP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EPP (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and TPP (TEB Portföy Pusula Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EPP | TPP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.29% | −1.13% | 0.16% |
| 1 week | 0.68% | 0.53% | 0.46% |
| 1 month | 3.11% | −2.97% | 1.10% |
| 3 months | 9.84% | −1.25% | 3.53% |
| 6 months | 22.04% | 9.15% | 8.53% |
| YTD | 38.31% | 23.74% | 16.18% |
| 1 year | 47.14% | 45.74% | 19.94% |
| 3 years | — | 240.51% | 103.56% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EPP vs TPP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EPP (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and TPP (TEB Portföy Pusula Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EPP leads in 8 and TPP leads in 1. EPP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TPP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: EPP leads (0.29% vs −1.13%). 1 week: EPP leads (0.68% vs 0.53%). 1 month: EPP leads (3.11% vs −2.97%). 3 months: EPP leads (9.84% vs −1.25%). 6 months: EPP leads (22.04% vs 9.15%). YTD: EPP leads (38.31% vs 23.74%). 1 year: EPP leads (47.14% vs 45.74%). Size (TRY): EPP leads (1.7B vs 1.6B). Investors: TPP leads (324 vs 50).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EPP or TPP?
Year to date EPP returned 38.31% and TPP returned 23.74%; over the last year EPP returned 47.14% and TPP returned 45.74%. Over the last month EPP returned 3.11% and TPP returned −2.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EPP or TPP?
As of November 2, 2026, EPP has a size of TRY 1.7B with 50 investors, while TPP has a size of TRY 1.6B with 324 investors. EPP leads in size and TPP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EPP and TPP mean?
The CMB risk score of EPP is 2 out of 7 and that of TPP is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.