DVT vs MET Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DVT (Deniz Portföy Metaverse ve Dijital Yaşam Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and MET (Garanti Portföy Metaverse ve Yeni Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | DVT | MET | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −3.53% | −4.29% | −1.41% |
| 1 week | −2.26% | −2.66% | −0.69% |
| 1 month | −9.09% | −8.11% | −3.96% |
| 3 months | −2.26% | −0.63% | −1.43% |
| 6 months | 9.34% | 5.95% | 1.85% |
| YTD | 35.32% | 22.48% | 17.97% |
| 1 year | 36.08% | 23.28% | 23.69% |
| 3 years | 253.98% | 223.62% | 149.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the DVT vs MET Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DVT (Deniz Portföy Metaverse ve Dijital Yaşam Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and MET (Garanti Portföy Metaverse ve Yeni Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DVT leads in 7 and MET leads in 3. DVT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MET is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: DVT leads (−3.53% vs −4.29%). 1 week: DVT leads (−2.26% vs −2.66%). 1 month: MET leads (−8.11% vs −9.09%). 3 months: MET leads (−0.63% vs −2.26%). 6 months: DVT leads (9.34% vs 5.95%). YTD: DVT leads (35.32% vs 22.48%). 1 year: DVT leads (36.08% vs 23.28%). 3 years: DVT leads (253.98% vs 223.62%). Size (TRY): MET leads (702.2M vs 698.3M). Investors: DVT leads (9,423 vs 6,207).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, DVT or MET?
Year to date DVT returned 35.32% and MET returned 22.48%; over the last year DVT returned 36.08% and MET returned 23.28%. Over the last month DVT returned −9.09% and MET returned −8.11%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DVT or MET?
As of November 2, 2026, DVT has a size of TRY 698.3M with 9,423 investors, while MET has a size of TRY 702.2M with 6,207 investors. MET leads in size and DVT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DVT and MET mean?
The CMB risk score of DVT is 6 out of 7 and that of MET is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.