Yatırımcı.AI

DKL vs PPS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DKL (Deniz Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.

DKLPPS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DKL vs PPS Fund Comparison
MetricDKLPPSCategory median
Daily0.23%9.54%0.16%
1 week0.57%−0.96%0.46%
1 month2.32%28.52%1.10%
3 months6.08%20.30%3.53%
6 months12.22%6.03%8.53%
YTD18.73%15.99%16.18%
1 year22.28%24.38%19.94%
3 years—228.52%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DKL vs PPS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DKL (Deniz Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DKL leads in 4 and PPS leads in 6. DKL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PPS leads (9.54% vs 0.23%). 1 week: DKL leads (0.57% vs −0.96%). 1 month: PPS leads (28.52% vs 2.32%). 3 months: PPS leads (20.30% vs 6.08%). 6 months: DKL leads (12.22% vs 6.03%). YTD: DKL leads (18.73% vs 15.99%). 1 year: PPS leads (24.38% vs 22.28%). Size (TRY): PPS leads (446.9M vs 439.9M). Investors: PPS leads (1,467 vs 92). Risk: DKL leads (3 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DKL returned 18.73% and PPS returned 15.99%; over the last year DKL returned 22.28% and PPS returned 24.38%. Over the last month DKL returned 2.32% and PPS returned 28.52%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, DKL has a size of TRY 439.9M with 92 investors, while PPS has a size of TRY 446.9M with 1,467 investors. PPS leads in size and PPS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DKL is 3 out of 7 and that of PPS is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.