Yatırımcı.AI

CSH vs GZM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CSH (Pardus Portföy Üçüncü Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) side by side.

SPK decided to liquidate CSH in bulletin 2026/60 dated September 17, 2026; no buy or redemption orders are executed in the fund. Its returns in this comparison are based on the last price published on TEFAS (November 2, 2026). CSH fund page · SPK bulletin 2026/60

CSHGZM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CSH vs GZM Fund Comparison
MetricCSHGZMCategory median
Today (est.)—5.80%1.71%
Daily−15.45%0.54%0.16%
1 week−14.55%1.42%0.46%
1 month−99.92%4.21%1.10%
3 months−99.99%13.93%3.53%
6 months−99.99%34.82%8.53%
YTD−99.97%77.55%16.18%
1 year−100.00%67.43%19.94%
3 years−99.97%67.68%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 2, 2026, 15:49.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CSH vs GZM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CSH (Pardus Portföy Üçüncü Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CSH leads in 0 and GZM leads in 10. CSH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Pardus Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GZM leads (0.54% vs −15.45%). 1 week: GZM leads (1.42% vs −14.55%). 1 month: GZM leads (4.21% vs −99.92%). 3 months: GZM leads (13.93% vs −99.99%). 6 months: GZM leads (34.82% vs −99.99%). YTD: GZM leads (77.55% vs −99.97%). 1 year: GZM leads (67.43% vs −100.00%). 3 years: GZM leads (67.68% vs −99.97%). Size (TRY): GZM leads (548.7M vs 882.3K). Investors: GZM leads (886 vs 54).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CSH returned −99.97% and GZM returned 77.55%; over the last year CSH returned −100.00% and GZM returned 67.43%. Over the last month CSH returned −99.92% and GZM returned 4.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, CSH has a size of TRY 882.3K with 54 investors, while GZM has a size of TRY 548.7M with 886 investors. GZM leads in size and GZM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CSH is 7 out of 7 and that of GZM is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.