Yatırımcı.AI

BVM vs HVC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVM (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and HVC (Hedef Portföy Rota Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

SPK decided to liquidate HVC in bulletin 2026/60 dated September 17, 2026; no buy or redemption orders are executed in the fund. Its returns in this comparison are based on the last price published on TEFAS (November 2, 2026). HVC fund page · SPK bulletin 2026/60

BVMHVC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BVM vs HVC Fund Comparison
MetricBVMHVCCategory median
Today (est.)2.81%—2.41%
Daily−3.16%−0.39%0.16%
1 week−4.63%−0.27%0.46%
1 month−14.57%−93.29%1.10%
3 months−23.62%−93.85%3.53%
6 months−17.07%−93.75%8.53%
YTD−15.59%−93.61%16.18%
1 year−66.39%−94.02%19.94%
3 years−60.47%−97.49%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 2, 2026, 16:38.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BVM vs HVC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BVM (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and HVC (Hedef Portföy Rota Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BVM leads in 7 and HVC leads in 3. BVM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; HVC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Hedef Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: HVC leads (−0.39% vs −3.16%). 1 week: HVC leads (−0.27% vs −4.63%). 1 month: BVM leads (−14.57% vs −93.29%). 3 months: BVM leads (−23.62% vs −93.85%). 6 months: BVM leads (−17.07% vs −93.75%). YTD: BVM leads (−15.59% vs −93.61%). 1 year: BVM leads (−66.39% vs −94.02%). 3 years: BVM leads (−60.47% vs −97.49%). Size (TRY): HVC leads (4.3M vs 3.9M). Investors: BVM leads (100 vs 16).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BVM returned −15.59% and HVC returned −93.61%; over the last year BVM returned −66.39% and HVC returned −94.02%. Over the last month BVM returned −14.57% and HVC returned −93.29%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, BVM has a size of TRY 3.9M with 100 investors, while HVC has a size of TRY 4.3M with 16 investors. HVC leads in size and BVM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BVM is 7 out of 7 and that of HVC is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.