Yatırımcı.AI

BHS vs GTM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BHS (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GTM (Garanti Portföy Temettü Ödeyen Şirketler Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

BHSGTM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BHS vs GTM Fund Comparison
MetricBHSGTMCategory median
Today (est.)—0.13%1.61%
Daily−2.60%−2.92%−3.03%
1 week−2.33%−2.27%−3.00%
1 month−6.78%−9.81%−11.63%
3 months−2.93%−9.49%−13.94%
6 months−4.14%−12.50%−14.98%
YTD16.12%12.34%2.54%
1 year19.79%17.11%4.18%
3 years121.35%115.40%79.59%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 2, 2026, 18:14.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BHS vs GTM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BHS (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GTM (Garanti Portföy Temettü Ödeyen Şirketler Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BHS leads in 8 and GTM leads in 2. BHS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; GTM is a Stock Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BHS leads (−2.60% vs −2.92%). 1 week: GTM leads (−2.27% vs −2.33%). 1 month: BHS leads (−6.78% vs −9.81%). 3 months: BHS leads (−2.93% vs −9.49%). 6 months: BHS leads (−4.14% vs −12.50%). YTD: BHS leads (16.12% vs 12.34%). 1 year: BHS leads (19.79% vs 17.11%). 3 years: BHS leads (121.35% vs 115.40%). Size (TRY): GTM leads (902.9M vs 879.8M). Investors: BHS leads (23,980 vs 12,295).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BHS returned 16.12% and GTM returned 12.34%; over the last year BHS returned 19.79% and GTM returned 17.11%. Over the last month BHS returned −6.78% and GTM returned −9.81%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, BHS has a size of TRY 879.8M with 23,980 investors, while GTM has a size of TRY 902.9M with 12,295 investors. GTM leads in size and BHS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BHS is 6 out of 7 and that of GTM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.