Yatırımcı.AI

BHS vs EHK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BHS (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and EHK (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

BHSEHK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BHS vs EHK Fund Comparison
MetricBHSEHKCategory median
Daily−2.60%−3.22%−3.03%
1 week−2.33%−3.22%−3.00%
1 month−6.78%−11.42%−11.63%
3 months−2.93%−9.97%−13.94%
6 months−4.14%−10.21%−14.98%
YTD16.12%20.47%2.54%
1 year19.79%19.94%4.18%
3 years121.35%—79.59%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BHS vs EHK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BHS (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and EHK (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BHS leads in 7 and EHK leads in 2. BHS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; EHK is a Stock Fund fund managed by —.

Highlights: Daily: BHS leads (−2.60% vs −3.22%). 1 week: BHS leads (−2.33% vs −3.22%). 1 month: BHS leads (−6.78% vs −11.42%). 3 months: BHS leads (−2.93% vs −9.97%). 6 months: BHS leads (−4.14% vs −10.21%). YTD: EHK leads (20.47% vs 16.12%). 1 year: EHK leads (19.94% vs 19.79%). Size (TRY): BHS leads (879.8M vs 860.4M). Investors: BHS leads (23,980 vs 14,498).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BHS returned 16.12% and EHK returned 20.47%; over the last year BHS returned 19.79% and EHK returned 19.94%. Over the last month BHS returned −6.78% and EHK returned −11.42%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, BHS has a size of TRY 879.8M with 23,980 investors, while EHK has a size of TRY 860.4M with 14,498 investors. BHS leads in size and BHS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BHS is 6 out of 7 and that of EHK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.