AZK vs VES Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AZK (Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VES (Türkiye Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AZK | VES | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.09% | 0.27% | 0.27% |
| 1 week | 0.36% | 0.62% | 0.60% |
| 1 month | 2.39% | 2.93% | 2.84% |
| 3 months | 9.03% | 9.17% | 9.11% |
| 6 months | 18.49% | 19.31% | 18.32% |
| YTD | 24.38% | 31.39% | 26.14% |
| 1 year | 37.52% | 40.46% | 37.81% |
| 3 years | 173.13% | 221.44% | 176.49% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AZK vs VES Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AZK (Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VES (Türkiye Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AZK leads in 1 and VES leads in 9. AZK is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; VES is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Türkiye Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: VES leads (0.27% vs 0.09%). 1 week: VES leads (0.62% vs 0.36%). 1 month: VES leads (2.93% vs 2.39%). 3 months: VES leads (9.17% vs 9.03%). 6 months: VES leads (19.31% vs 18.49%). YTD: VES leads (31.39% vs 24.38%). 1 year: VES leads (40.46% vs 37.52%). 3 years: VES leads (221.44% vs 173.13%). Size (TRY): VES leads (9B vs 7.6B). Investors: AZK leads (268,234 vs 135,148).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AZK or VES?
Year to date AZK returned 24.38% and VES returned 31.39%; over the last year AZK returned 37.52% and VES returned 40.46%. Over the last month AZK returned 2.39% and VES returned 2.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AZK or VES?
As of November 2, 2026, AZK has a size of TRY 7.6B with 268,234 investors, while VES has a size of TRY 9B with 135,148 investors. VES leads in size and AZK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AZK and VES mean?
The CMB risk score of AZK is 3 out of 7 and that of VES is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.