AVN vs MHK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AVN (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHK (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AVN | MHK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.64% | −0.59% | −0.59% |
| 1 week | −0.44% | −0.65% | −0.46% |
| 1 month | −1.19% | −0.88% | −1.11% |
| 3 months | 4.22% | 5.44% | 4.12% |
| 6 months | 7.01% | 9.29% | 7.12% |
| YTD | 20.45% | 16.71% | 18.73% |
| 1 year | 28.87% | 26.04% | 26.93% |
| 3 years | 157.04% | 114.68% | 144.09% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AVN vs MHK Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AVN (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHK (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AVN leads in 4 and MHK leads in 6. AVN is a Standard Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHK is a Standard Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MHK leads (−0.59% vs −0.64%). 1 week: AVN leads (−0.44% vs −0.65%). 1 month: MHK leads (−0.88% vs −1.19%). 3 months: MHK leads (5.44% vs 4.22%). 6 months: MHK leads (9.29% vs 7.01%). YTD: AVN leads (20.45% vs 16.71%). 1 year: AVN leads (28.87% vs 26.04%). 3 years: AVN leads (157.04% vs 114.68%). Size (TRY): MHK leads (2.7B vs 1.5B). Investors: MHK leads (136,905 vs 32,058).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AVN or MHK?
Year to date AVN returned 20.45% and MHK returned 16.71%; over the last year AVN returned 28.87% and MHK returned 26.04%. Over the last month AVN returned −1.19% and MHK returned −0.88%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AVN or MHK?
As of November 2, 2026, AVN has a size of TRY 1.5B with 32,058 investors, while MHK has a size of TRY 2.7B with 136,905 investors. MHK leads in size and MHK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AVN and MHK mean?
The CMB risk score of AVN is 4 out of 7 and that of MHK is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.