AVN vs AZS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AVN (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and AZS (Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AVN | AZS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.64% | −0.67% | −0.59% |
| 1 week | −0.44% | −0.47% | −0.46% |
| 1 month | −1.19% | −1.27% | −1.11% |
| 3 months | 4.22% | 4.12% | 4.12% |
| 6 months | 7.01% | 6.69% | 7.12% |
| YTD | 20.45% | 20.20% | 18.73% |
| 1 year | 28.87% | 28.78% | 26.93% |
| 3 years | 157.04% | 159.29% | 144.09% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AVN vs AZS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AVN (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and AZS (Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AVN leads in 9 and AZS leads in 1. AVN is a Standard Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; AZS is a Standard Fund fund managed by Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: AVN leads (−0.64% vs −0.67%). 1 week: AVN leads (−0.44% vs −0.47%). 1 month: AVN leads (−1.19% vs −1.27%). 3 months: AVN leads (4.22% vs 4.12%). 6 months: AVN leads (7.01% vs 6.69%). YTD: AVN leads (20.45% vs 20.20%). 1 year: AVN leads (28.87% vs 28.78%). 3 years: AZS leads (159.29% vs 157.04%). Size (TRY): AVN leads (1.5B vs 1.2B). Investors: AVN leads (32,058 vs 28,028).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AVN or AZS?
Year to date AVN returned 20.45% and AZS returned 20.20%; over the last year AVN returned 28.87% and AZS returned 28.78%. Over the last month AVN returned −1.19% and AZS returned −1.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AVN or AZS?
As of November 2, 2026, AVN has a size of TRY 1.5B with 32,058 investors, while AZS has a size of TRY 1.2B with 28,028 investors. AVN leads in size and AVN leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AVN and AZS mean?
The CMB risk score of AVN is 4 out of 7 and that of AZS is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.