Yatırımcı.AI

AUV vs PJP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AUV (Ak Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PJP (Perform Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

AUVPJP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AUV vs PJP Fund Comparison
MetricAUVPJPCategory median
Daily0.99%0.18%0.16%
1 week1.24%0.54%0.46%
1 month4.59%2.41%1.10%
3 months4.43%5.25%3.53%
6 months10.53%11.56%8.53%
YTD13.65%19.32%16.18%
1 year18.62%−0.16%19.94%
3 years12.92%72.10%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AUV vs PJP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AUV (Ak Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PJP (Perform Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AUV leads in 6 and PJP leads in 4. AUV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PJP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Perform Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AUV leads (0.99% vs 0.18%). 1 week: AUV leads (1.24% vs 0.54%). 1 month: AUV leads (4.59% vs 2.41%). 3 months: PJP leads (5.25% vs 4.43%). 6 months: PJP leads (11.56% vs 10.53%). YTD: PJP leads (19.32% vs 13.65%). 1 year: AUV leads (18.62% vs −0.16%). 3 years: PJP leads (72.10% vs 12.92%). Size (TRY): AUV leads (347.2M vs 339.9M). Investors: AUV leads (442 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AUV returned 13.65% and PJP returned 19.32%; over the last year AUV returned 18.62% and PJP returned −0.16%. Over the last month AUV returned 4.59% and PJP returned 2.41%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, AUV has a size of TRY 347.2M with 442 investors, while PJP has a size of TRY 339.9M with 6 investors. AUV leads in size and AUV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AUV is — out of 7 and that of PJP is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.