Yatırımcı.AI

AUV vs FSH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AUV (Ak Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) side by side.

AUVFSH
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AUV vs FSH Fund Comparison
MetricAUVFSHCategory median
Daily0.99%−2.81%0.16%
1 week1.24%0.25%0.46%
1 month4.59%−4.25%1.10%
3 months4.43%3.81%3.53%
6 months10.53%15.66%8.53%
YTD13.65%32.54%16.18%
1 year18.62%30.69%19.94%
3 years12.92%259.03%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AUV vs FSH Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AUV (Ak Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AUV leads in 6 and FSH leads in 4. AUV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FSH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AUV leads (0.99% vs −2.81%). 1 week: AUV leads (1.24% vs 0.25%). 1 month: AUV leads (4.59% vs −4.25%). 3 months: AUV leads (4.43% vs 3.81%). 6 months: FSH leads (15.66% vs 10.53%). YTD: FSH leads (32.54% vs 13.65%). 1 year: FSH leads (30.69% vs 18.62%). 3 years: FSH leads (259.03% vs 12.92%). Size (TRY): AUV leads (347.2M vs 341.3M). Investors: AUV leads (442 vs 431).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AUV returned 13.65% and FSH returned 32.54%; over the last year AUV returned 18.62% and FSH returned 30.69%. Over the last month AUV returned 4.59% and FSH returned −4.25%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, AUV has a size of TRY 347.2M with 442 investors, while FSH has a size of TRY 341.3M with 431 investors. AUV leads in size and AUV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AUV is — out of 7 and that of FSH is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.